Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Where My Children R is Heaven 2 Me









Each time a man stands up 4 an ideal
or acts to improve the lot of others or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope
, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.




Journal entry 06/22/05

Beginning in the early nineteen fifties as wide-spread access to in-home TV began, our knowledge and perception of children has come, in large part, from popular TV personalities. From Art Linkletter‘s “kids say the funniest things“, to Mr. Rogers’ serene neighborhood; to learning with Big Bird & Barney, to having fun with Bill Cosbys’ “hey, hey, hey”, our idealized child was bright, happy, knowing, loving and virtuous. The child development experts, from Dr. Spock, to Dr. Brazelton and, now, Dr Phil were more than ready to validate this version of what a normal child could be if only they were “appropriately” nurtured.

A disconnect occurs when we try to reconcile this “model” child with all the real children that we know. A source of the disconnect is how few of our children are “appropriately” nurtured. While the details of “appropriately” would undoubtedly be debated, I believe a consensus exists for the broad elements
of such nurturing. The elements would include: safety, consistency, respect, affection, positive reinforcement, caring inter-action, play, talking, reading and holding. The providers of this nurturing can
be anyone who can “genuinely” offer such nurturing. The sad and troubling reality is that there are vastly fewer providers of “genuine” nurturing then there are children to be nurtured.

Little mention will be made of the obvious outcomes resulting so often from the absence of nurturing parenting. Generations of single moms (both young and those not so young), school drop-outs, bullies, and, in too many instances, non-feeling, loners that do monstrous deeds. Far too few in our society ever develop an understanding of their own self -worth and therefore are unable to imbue others with it. Lacking a sense of something (anything) having value, it easily is concluded that all things (including lives) are value-less. And value-less things need no consideration, or compassion or other human emotion.

My focus, instead is on this question: “if parenting (or it’s absence) is so powerful in determining who we become, why do we leave it to chance.?” One would expect that we would forget about everything else and concentrate our full attention on improving the chances (e.g. “increasing the odds”) that we end up with individuals who understand and respect the notion that all of our individual actions, good/and bad ones, come with some consequence attached like a shadow. And, alas, that the individual gives a damn about that consequence.



Now we are engaged in a great (civil) war, testing whether that nation, or any nation, so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war.

The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us ?that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion ?that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain ?that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom ?and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. (in part - the Gettysburg Address)




PARENTING IN AMERICA---INCREASING THE ODDS

About the Author:


It's time for less talk, more action. Nay. It's past time. It's past time for the "united people" of the "united states" to "unite". No partisanship. No right/left wing. No religious bias. No racial lines. No gender lines.

Who wants to start?

Thursday, July 21, 2011




Date: July 2011

Work-in-progress

It’s My Life: “Live” front-row seat


“Live” front-row seat…but no-one rides for free; a memoir of growing-up in America from General Dwight (“Ike”) Eisenhower, through the Kennedy years, the Ronald (“Dutch”) Reagan era, and on to the Bush father & son, Clintons try 2 make it 3,
And what have we here…the audacity… of ???


Meaning of the title, “Live” front-row seat.

For every person connected to the internet, the
very little is “live”. By “live”, I mean “in-person” witness to events. To have front-row seats that are also “live” is to have first-hand knowledge and experience of the event. “Live” has un-filtered exposure and can generate a unique take on both what happened and the consequences of what happened. While “live” front row seat indicates observer of events, it also denotes that
the observer is not a participant.


A list of my “Live” front-seat occasions:

‘49 Televised baseball
‘50s …My little Margie Lucky Strike Hit Parade…Little League
‘56 political conventions on tv
‘60 Discrimination E. Palo Alto Menlo Park Atherton
‘60s TV sock hop guest
‘64 Ray Charles, What I say… SF Cow-Palace
‘64-65 Haight Ashbury Counter Culture; S.F. State ...longshoreman’s hall….Janis; Jerry Garcia…
‘68 Anti-war…Gene McCarthy in Sheboygan…demonstrations
‘68 Warren Commission Report…college lecturer Sheboygan
‘70Anti-war protester
‘71 McGovern campaign
‘72 Hippie; activist; professor; husband/father
‘75 personal tragedy
‘76 DC carter elect;
‘77 Hostages, double digit
‘78 politics
‘80 Muhammad Ali
‘82 Ground Zero…the Boss
‘84 back to school…the old run around
‘88 love
‘90 drop out
‘94 and to him a son was born
‘98 and a daughter
‘01 putting down roots; making the nest
‘03 Parkinson’s diagnosed
‘04 housing prices…very good for us, not so good for most
‘06 energy prices; gas prices; war in the middle east; or as that sage of the ball-diamond, Yogi Berra, observed, it’s like “deja-vu all over again“.
Future what about the children?

Friday, June 24, 2011

TIME FOR A PULSE CHECK





TIME FOR A PULSE CHECK

2 months and 250+ friends This is Spirit-in-sky-Paul as of today, June 24, 2011.

A Unit is complete and a strong beginning on Spirit-in-sky-Paul-1 is under way. This is a good time to check in with each of you. And, a good time for you to evaluate how you feel about sticking around.

Below are some pre-canned responses for you to choose.


1. I see little value in what U R doing (in fact I have not a clue) so Good time for me to be removed.

2. I almost never even bother to see what you do. But I’ll stay.


3. For a stupid white man you are okay.


4. Don’t go falling all over but I starting to look forward to the next post.


5. For whom I am the baby…got to love me.


Choose a number that best describes how you feel…and paste it in the
“comment” box. You are the best

(polling place propaganda).

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Keeping Hope Alive



Journal entry 06/22/05

Beginning in the early nineteen fifties as wide-spread access to in-home TV began, our knowledge and perception of children has come, in large part, from popular TV personalities. From Art Linkletter‘s “kids say the funniest things“, to Mr. Rogers’ serene neighborhood; to learning with Big Bird & Barney, to having fun with Bill Cosbys’ “hey, hey, hey”, our idealized child was bright, happy, knowing, loving and virtuous. The child development experts, from Dr. Spock, to Dr. Brazelton and, now, Dr Phil were more than ready to validate this version of what a normal child could be if only they were “appropriately” nurtured.

A disconnect occurs when we try to reconcile this “model” child with all the real children that we know. A source of the disconnect is how few of our children are “appropriately” nurtured. While the details of “appropriately” would undoubtedly be debated, I believe a consensus exists for the broad elements
of such nurturing. The elements would include: safety, consistency, respect, affection, positive reinforcement, caring inter-action, play, talking, reading and holding. The providers of this nurturing can
be anyone who can “genuinely” offer such nurturing. The sad and troubling reality is that there are vastly fewer providers of “genuine” nurturing then there are children to be nurtured.

Little mention will be made of the obvious outcomes resulting so often from the absence of nurturing parenting. Generations of single moms (both young and those not so young), school drop-outs, bullies, and, in too many instances, non-feeling, loners that do monstrous deeds. Far too few in our society ever develop an understanding of their own self -worth and therefore are unable to imbue others with it. Lacking a sense of something (anything) having value, it easily is concluded that all things (including lives) are value-less. And value-less things need no consideration, or compassion or other human emotion.

My focus, instead is on this question: “if parenting (or it’s absence) is so powerful in determining who we become, why do we leave it to chance.?” One would expect that we would forget about everything else and concentrate our full attention on improving the chances (e.g. “increasing the odds”) that we end up with individuals who understand and respect the notion that all of our individual actions, good/and bad ones, come with some consequence attached like a shadow. And, alas, that the individual gives a damn about that consequence.



Now we are engaged in a great (civil) war, testing whether that nation, or any nation, so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war.

The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us ?that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion ?that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain ?that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom ?and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. (in part - the Gettysburg Address)

PARENTING IN AMERICA---INCREASING THE ODDS

About the Author:


It's time for less talk, more action. Nay. It's past time. It's past time for the "united people" of the "united states" to "unite". No partisanship. No right/left wing. No religious bias. No racial lines. No gender lines.

Who wants to start?

When all you have in your tool-box is a hammer


An All But Empty Tool Box







When all you have in your tool-box is a hammer, everything begins
to look like a nail…


Due to the vagaries of life, I have been a primary care giver for two sets of biological children.

My first years were 1969 - 1975. My first child was a daughter born in 1969. I was a graduate student and part-time college instructor. These years were during the counter-culture period. A Dad and his daughter were viewed as trend setters and breaking new ground. It was assumed that I would be a model for male parenting for the future.

My second period began in 1994 with the birth of my third child and first son. At age 51 I was almost always mistaken as the grandfather. As a grandfather with a feminine touch and therefore a welcome and admired addition.

You’ve probably heard the phrase “driving while black,” which refers to a perception that black drivers are more likely to be stopped by cops. This was whispered in the African-American community for years before it broke out into the wider cultural conversation and was gradually validated by empirical studies.

Similarly, stay-at-home dads have whispered for years about feeling unfairly targeted for "parenting while male," and recently their concerns have started to get mainstream attention.

In last week's Wall Street Journal, Free-Range Kids author Lenore Skenazy explored what happens when “when almost any man who has anything to do with a child can find himself suspected of being a creep.”

At some point, though, I realized being a full-time father was my role and that’s what my wife and kids needed more so than a paycheck. Once I reached this mindset, what other mothers thought of me didn’t matter anymore. I just did the best I could, and tried to be as charming as possible. In a way, it turned the tables because most of these mothers had insecurities of their own in their role.

I think that’s the best answer. Just do the best you can. Love your kid shamelessly, and don’t hold back. Reach out and build relationships. Be a big boy and rise above the playground squabbles—hard as it may be. The kids—and the country—will be better off for it.

“It’s clear dads have become much more hands-on when it comes to parenting. From cooking meals to driving the kids to soccer practice, dads have been consistently taking on increased roles at home. Here at Salary.com, we see fathers as versatile workers who perform a myriad of day-to-day jobs that would make them attractive and valuable to any employer.”

Just in time for Father’s Day, Salary.com has released an intriguing survey of 1,074 stay-at-home and working dads.
This year’s survey found stay-at-home dads work an average of 52.9 hours a week. Factoring in base pay plus overtime, these dads would earn $60,128 a year. Working fathers would be paid $33,858 a year after spending 30.6 hours a week on parenting duties. And that’s on top of working an average of 44 hours a week at their day jobs.
The survey was in part motivated by the 154,000 American men who became stay-at-home dads last year.

But how about we start giving dads the love they deserve

The majority of the men responding reported that they spent at least 30 hours a week as primary caregiver. Twenty-four percent claimed they had been refused entry to a playground or playgroup, while a majority had felt they had been criticized by other parents in public. Most also felt this treatment was based on the fact that they were male.

If these men, who are not only fathers on the playground, but coaches, role models, and mentors, too—if these men are prevented from being human in this way, what is that teaching the children about the role men play in their lives? A society that believes in gender equality should recognize the importance of men as well as women in raising kids. As more and more men take on the traditional homemaker’s role, we are going to see a lot more dads at mom’s groups. Moms, you’re going to have to make room. But this is a good thing.

Jeremy Adam Smith's book is a long awaited and much needed new perspective on the roles of men in the emotional development of children. Particularly boys.
When a boys emotional development kit contains nothing but a hammer, the world of such boys is seen as a landscape full of nails to be hammered into submission.
Pray that stay--at-home Dads offer our boys a rich variety of new tools for their kits.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Peace through the common language of Music





Music has provided the backdrop to major life-altering events as well as providing a source of comfort and renewals to individuals. Music has been from the beginning.
It is a constant and ever-changing. In America, we have Native American, Cajun, Country, Classical, and many others.

I was introduced to dance music by my Mom,circa 1950
. The Big Band sound was her 1st choice. TV had the Lucky Strike Parade of hits, the radio was introducing different
sounds and artists. It is an immeasurable part of my life.

Difficult times






Each time a man stands up 4 an ideal
or acts to improve the lot of others or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope
, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.